From a business bottleneck to an operation we manage.
We start with the work and what it costs you today. Then we build one focused improvement with the right controls, run it and review how it performs.
Bring the business priority. We help define the first step.
Every stage hands you something you can check.
Long projects cost months of attention before anything changes. The first operation is live in about 30 days once scope and access are ready.
If the agreed outcome hasn’t arrived by day 60, we keep working at no additional cost until it has.
- Stage 1
Understand
Review real cases, what your software already does, the constraints and the baseline.
You receiveA recommended first operation and its business case.
- Stage 2
Design and implement
Agree responsibilities, information, actions and approvals, then test real cases with your team.
You receiveAn agreed scope and a tested operation.
- Stage 3
Manage
Monitor the work, investigate failures, keep sources current and route exceptions to the right owner.
You receiveA named contact and a clear view of the agreed service.
- Stage 4
Improve
Compare results with the baseline, review quality and cost and decide what changes next.
You receiveA written improvement plan and the evidence for any expansion.
A change in the business changes the next step.
A client requests extra work. That request affects scope, delivery capacity and billing. This example shows how an operation gathers the context, prepares a decision and carries out the approved next steps.
01 · SEE
Bring the relevant work and context together.
The operation gathers the request, agreed scope and available project information. It flags missing records so the next step reflects what is known, rather than assuming the file is complete.
The connected workIllustrative exampleNewClient request
Additional deliverable requested
Client asks for Friday delivery
ReviewAgreed scope
Current scope retrieved
Requested addition is not listed
CheckTeam capacity
Required specialist has existing work
Availability needs confirmation
PendingProject milestone
Current milestone awaits approval
Billing follows the agreed terms
Four related records. One decision to prepare.
02 · DECIDE
Identify the decision and who should make it.
The operation checks the request against the agreed rules and available context. Here, scope, effort and timing need an account lead’s decision before a new commitment can be made.
Decision contextAdditional client deliverableIllustrative exampleWhy now: Friday deadline, the specialist is committed and the addition is outside scope.
Agreed scopeAddition not listedEstimated effortDelivery lead to confirmRequired capacitySpecialist already committedRequested timingFridayExisting milestoneApproval pendingDecision ownerAccount leadPrepared for the account leadPrepare a scope and timing decision.
The account lead needs the request, current commitments and missing estimate before responding to the client.
03 · ACT
Carry out the approved step and track the result.
The decision reaches the right person with the supporting context. Once the required approvals are recorded, the operation updates the agreed records and coordinates the next administrative steps.
Action and approvalIllustrative exampleDecision preparedRoutedRequest, scope and capacity context sent to the account lead.
Approved change appliedUpdatedAfter the required internal and client approvals, the revised plan and billing instruction are recorded.
Required approvals are recorded before commitments change.OwnerAccount lead retains scope, pricing and client commitments.04 · OUTCOME
An approved change is progress, not yet the result.
A routed question is still open. The business result depends on what happens in delivery and billing, measured against the outcome agreed at the start.
What changed in this exampleIllustrative exampleApprovedScope decision recorded
Required approvals are on record
UpdatedDelivery plan updated
Revised timing and owner confirmed
RecordedBilling instruction recorded
Next billing step follows agreed terms
Progress recorded. Delivered work and payment are measured separately.
05 · IMPROVE
Use recurring problems to improve the operation.
Struq reviews the work, exceptions and the business measure, refines the process within approved boundaries and checks whether the change helped.
What the month showedIllustrative exampleChange requests handled12Decided within a day7Still open3What we learnedSome requests reached the account lead without an effort estimate, delaying the decision.
What changes nextAdd the estimate check earlier and compare decision time and rework at the next review.
Struq runs the agreed work and your team keeps the decisions.
Work that belongs to nobody waits for whoever has time. Before launch we agree the scope, permitted actions and exception paths, so every item has an owner.
- Workflow design and implementation
- Monitoring and maintenance
- Approved administrative actions
- Exception routing and action records
- Reporting and the weekly review
- Improvements within the agreed scope
- Access to the relevant systems
- Process knowledge and examples
- Business priorities and outcome approval
- Professional and licensed judgment
- Pricing and contractual commitments
- Approvals and feedback on results
System issues go to Struq. Business decisions go to your named owner with the context attached.
System availability
The operation runs on the schedule agreed for your workflow.
Staffed support
Our team’s response times are written into your agreement, not assumed.
Know what moved this week and what needs a decision.
Every Monday you see progress against the agreed measure, the work still open and the next improvement. System issues are handled as they arise, never saved for the report.
Sample weekly review
Illustrative$18,400
Approved extra work ready to bill
$27,500
Starts invoiced on time (12 of 15)
Still open
- Three starts waiting on a named client approver
- One calendar sync failed and Struq is investigating
Needs your decision
- Approve or decline a $6,200 change request
- Choose who signs off larger scope changes
Next improvement
Add an approver check to onboarding, then compare readiness at the next review.
Questions owners ask before we start.
No. We assess what your systems and their built-in AI already do and use them where practical. We build only the missing steps. Any required connections or access limits are made explicit before the build.
Everything in the agreed scope: the workflow, its connections, system issues and the weekly review. Your team keeps the decisions agreed upfront. Coverage and support arrangements are defined in the agreement before work starts.
An owner for the outcome, access to the relevant systems and someone who knows the process. Your team confirms rules, reviews realistic examples and makes decisions. Your staff never become responsible for maintaining the system.
A focused workflow is live in about 30 days once scope, access and readiness are confirmed. We agree the launch plan before building. Complex connections or extra review requirements can change that timeline.
We agree the baseline and the business measure before building. Actions and replies show progress, but they are not revenue or a completed outcome. If the agreed outcome hasn’t arrived by day 60, we keep working at no additional cost until it has.
Missing information, failed actions and exceptions each get a defined path. Struq investigates system issues and your named owner makes the business decisions. We agree when work pauses and how it resumes.
No. Bring the part of the business you want to improve. The first conversation finds a promising starting point and what needs further review, and the final scope follows that assessment.
See where Struq could help first.
Tell us where work waits in your business today. You leave with a clear first step and what we would review before defining the build.